Most PPC retainers buy activity: campaigns, a deck, a weekly call. We sell a governed mix on a scoreboard a finance lead can sit with, watched between the meetings, with a human still on the hook. If that sounds like the same thing as "an agency," this page is the distinction.
The comparison that matters is not "do they know Google Ads." It is whether the operating system changes when the budget does.
We are an agency. This page is not a denial. It is the difference between a media buyer you can swap and an operating partner whose absence you would feel in the numbers within a month. The hiring cluster already covers how to choose, what to ask, and pricing models. This page is the commercial foil: us, versus the default retainer those articles are written against.
Hands in the interface. A weekly or monthly review. Reporting that restates the platforms. Optimization inside the average: pause this, raise that, launch a test. At $15k a month of spend that can be enough. At $80k it is how you scale into a blended number that still looks fine while the last increment of spend is underwater. The operator never changed jobs. The budget did.
A mix governed on blended contribution, with attributed views as a lens rather than a scoreboard. A platform that drafts holds and reallocations between reviews, and a named strategist who approves anything material. Feed, creative, and tracking treated as infrastructure, not IT tickets. Fees on a published card so you can see how the incentive behaves as spend grows, instead of discovering it in month seven.
Premier Partner status is not on this table on purpose. We have published that it selects for size, not craft. If that filter is how you are shortlisting, read the hiring post rather than this page.
When the account is simple, the spend is modest, and you need competent execution more than a new operating system. A good small specialist on one channel can beat us on that brief, especially below our floor. We will say so. In-house versus agency covers the other fork: when you should not hire any agency.
Ecommerce mix: ecommerce PPC. Six-figure spend: enterprise PPC. Shopify Plus architecture: Shopify Plus. If the comparison you meant was software, not an agency, use Triple Whale or Hyros.
The media is the surface. The product is a governed mix: blended truth, named operator load, sensing between reviews, and human approval on material changes. A typical retainer sells activity in the ad accounts. Both can look like "an agency" on a homepage. They do not feel the same at $80k a month.
Sometimes at low spend, often less so as spend grows, because a published base-plus-overage ladder does not take a full percentage of every extra dollar. Run the arithmetic on /pricing against a 10 to 15 percent quote at your actual budget rather than comparing retainers as adjectives. The models article in Insights works the incentive sizes neutrally.
Yes. The platform drafts. A strategist whose load is a stated number approves. Six-figure accounts do not get a rotating bench with a shared inbox. If you want a weekly call and no software in the loop, plenty of retainers will sell that. We will not pretend the account is watched when it is not.
Written by Sam Nouri, founder. If the comparison you actually needed is not on this page, say so or run a free audit.
How we research, source figures, and handle corrections: editorial policy.
Buy software if you already have an operator and need a better number. Buy an agency if you need the operator. Buying software to postpone the second decision is how dashboards multiply.
Read the comparisonBuy Triple Whale if you need an in-house team to see attributed ecommerce revenue. Hire us if the problem is that nobody is governing the next dollar, and the dashboard is not the bottleneck.
Read the comparisonBuy Hyros if you run your own media and the conversion that matters is a phone call or a high-ticket checkout you cannot trust the platforms to report. Hire us if the media itself is the unsolved job.
Read the comparisonThere is a spend level above which one in-house hire is simply cheaper than an agency, and it is calculable rather than a matter of opinion: fully-loaded senior salary against a percentage-of-spend fee gives a crossover around $100,000 a month — with three specific reasons the naive crossover is too low. That is decision one. This is the full sequence: whether to hire, what shape, how to select, and how to structure the first ninety days so the arrangement can fail cleanly instead of drifting for a year.
A good question has a property almost nobody checks for: a weak agency cannot answer it well by being articulate. That single test disqualifies most of the questions in circulation — "what is your process," "can you show me case studies" — and it produces a much shorter list where each question comes with the answer that should reassure you and the answer that should end the meeting.
In-house teams win on context and focus; agencies win on cross-account pattern exposure and infrastructure. The honest cost math, where each model breaks, and the hybrid most scaling brands converge on.
The next one lands in your inbox. Account-level analysis written the way we brief our own operators. Unsubscribe in one click.