Hyros sells tracking and attribution, with particular strength on calls and high-ticket funnels, to businesses that already run ads. We sell the ads operation, on a first-party stack built around commerce and CRM truth. If you only needed a pixel, you should buy a pixel.
Hyros and Triple Whale get lumped together as "attribution tools." They are not the same buyer. Neither is us.
Hyros became the default recommendation in info, coaching, and high-ticket circles because platform pixels were lying about phone calls and long consideration. That is a real problem. It is not the same problem as "our $80k/month ecommerce mix has no one allocating the marginal dollar." Treating Hyros as an ADSRUNNER alternative usually means the brief was "we need better tracking" and someone also typed our name.
Hyros is tracking software. The product is click identity, funnel events, and (the reason many buyers show up) call tracking stitched back to ads. The ICP that fits is an operator or a small media team running their own accounts, often in info or high-ticket, who cannot trust Meta or Google to report the conversion that actually pays them. You install it. You still buy the ads. You still write the creative. You still decide the budget.
We do not sell Hyros-style call tracking as a product. We do not claim to replace their graph for a coaching funnel whose revenue event is a 45-minute sales call. If that is your business, Hyros (or a specialist call-tracking stack) is the category, and our lead generation and B2B PPC work is a different conversation: CRM closed-won, offline conversion imports, and an operator. Those can sit alongside call tracking. They are not a clone of it.
If a sales page told you we are "Hyros plus an agency," that page is wrong. We are an agency with owned tracking for the conversions we actually operate: orders, qualified pipeline, on-site events. Phone-call identity at Hyros depth is not a live claim.
Both of us exist because platform-reported revenue is not business revenue. Both of us hash identifiers, care about first-party collection, and try to reconnect a click to an outcome the ad account never saw. Our version of that is a first-party pixel, server-side conversion APIs, six attribution models, and a gate that will not promote attributed ROAS until it has been reconciled to Shopify or CRM truth. That is the same *problem* as Hyros. It is a different *shape*: commerce and pipeline, not call-led info funnels, and it ships as part of running the account rather than as a self-serve install.
The sibling comparison for ecommerce attribution dashboards is ADSRUNNER vs Triple Whale. The category page is attribution software vs an agency.
Not for the buyer who wanted call tracking and a self-serve graph. Yes for the buyer who wanted an operator and was using Hyros as a proxy for "someone who takes measurement seriously." Those are different briefs. This page exists so they do not get collapsed.
Not as a Hyros-style product. Lead-gen and B2B engagements optimize to CRM stages and closed-won, including offline conversion imports into Google. If the revenue event is the call itself and you need click-to-call identity as the source of truth, that is Hyros territory, and we will say so rather than stretch a media engagement over it.
Often, yes. Our managed floor is $30k+/month in paid media and our proof is ecommerce, SaaS, and B2B pipeline. Info and high-ticket coaching with a call-close motion is a specialist category. Use the audit if you want a read of the account. Do not hire us to be a cheaper Hyros.
Written by Sam Nouri, founder. If the comparison you actually needed is not on this page, say so or run a free audit.
How we research, source figures, and handle corrections: editorial policy.
Buy Triple Whale if you need an in-house team to see attributed ecommerce revenue. Hire us if the problem is that nobody is governing the next dollar, and the dashboard is not the bottleneck.
Read the comparisonBuy software if you already have an operator and need a better number. Buy an agency if you need the operator. Buying software to postpone the second decision is how dashboards multiply.
Read the comparisonHire a typical media buyer if you need extra hands in Ads Manager. Hire us if you need the account to change operating system when the budget does.
Read the comparisonOptimizing lead gen to CPL is how you fill a CRM with people who will never buy anything. The feedback loop, bidding setup, and reporting structure that aim spend at pipeline instead.
The ratio everyone optimizes — LTV:CAC — is a solvency measure, and companies do not die of insolvency. They die of illiquidity, which is what payback period measures. This is the playbook with that constraint put first: how payback sets your maximum self-funding growth rate, why a change to billing terms can double the budget you can afford while a campaign optimization moves it a few percent, and why in SaaS a month-end review is not just correlational but measuring the wrong quarter.
Every version of this article tells you to stop trusting ROAS and start trusting MER. That advice is not wrong so much as beside the point: MER and blended ROAS are the same economics inverted, and neither is safer than the revenue figure you feed it. Here is the ladder that ranks your revenue sources by trustworthiness, the arithmetic that turns one week of data into three contradictory decisions, and how to set the floor from your own P&L.
The next one lands in your inbox. Account-level analysis written the way we brief our own operators. Unsubscribe in one click.